it's not what you know, it's who you know...

For those who don't really know what's involved with Geospatial Intelligence, I sort of liken it to playing with Google Earth for a living.

The weird thing is that for a job which is clearly quite important, yet requires a specific skillset which people might not necessarily know they actually have, I think that the RAAF struggles for numbers because it's kind of obscure and also requires a ridiculously high security clearance which can take 18+ months to obtain.

So the Chief of Air Force has established a new program where Any Airman (ANYA) roles in this area have been created, involving a three year posting that includes training as a Geospatial Imagery Analyst (GIA) and deployment to the Middle East to carry out relevant duties. Depending on one's performance in the ANYA role, this could also facilitate a future remuster (changing of job) to GIA.

I've missed the boat for the first intake of ANYA GIAs, but it's definitely piqued my interest. Strangely enough, it was the reservist Logistics Officer that I spoke to a few times last year who first got me considering the possibility of intelligence related jobs. Perhaps if I collected more university units to do with international relations or counter-terrorism (yes, they do exist!) I could get a taste for secret squirrel business, and seem like I have a relevant degree.

I wonder how people get recruited for these jobs, if they supposedly have no previous experience and thus no evidence of how good they'd be at spying? Personally, I like the idea of analysing and scrutinising things for a living... it'd probably mean that I'd be too mentally exhausted at the end of the day to philosophise about the minutiae of my own life.

There's also something kinda Sim Cityesque about looking down on the world like some God whose subjects have no idea that they're being watched. Or maybe that's just me.

Test your skills at the Defence Imagery and Geospatial Organisation Imagery Analysis Quiz!

origins of an ironed chef

When I was growing up, Mum worked in a Chinese restaurant some nights, so Dad chipped in a lot with the cooking at home. I have plenty of fond memories relating to dishes that both of them made, which I never learned how to replicate for myself.

Mum’s from Taiwan, and a lot of the dishes she makes involve pastry or dough. I have a feeling that she won’t tell me her dumpling recipe because she knows deep down that it’s the one thing I’ll always have to go back home for. That, and she’s been making them for so long that she probably doesn’t even know how much of each ingredient goes into the mix. I don’t remember having measuring cups or jugs in the house – it must have been a combination of muscle memory, and the ratio of whatever felt right in her hands alone.

I used to love watching her make the wrappers for the dumplings – money was probably too tight to lash out on manufactured ones, or she was of the thought that processed wrappers were a waste of money if all it took was time to invest in rolling out homemade versions. The rhythm of the rolling pin, which was nought more than a thick dowel, would mesmerise me as I watched the small ball of dough become a circular shell for a dumpling. Then the steadily growing stack of wrappers would each receive a dollop of filling in its centre and be sealed off with several deft pinches from fingertips dipped in water.

Whenever I tried to help Mum out, on the very rare occasions that she’d let me have a go, I’d almost always stuff up somehow. Whether it was cutting out noodles and rolling too enthusiastically with the machine, or waiting to crack an egg into batter and clumsily landing some shell into the mix, or not sealing the ends of a spring roll adequately… Mum would sigh in exasperation and take whatever task I was attempting out of my hands. I was more of a hindrance than a help, no matter how good my intentions were.

As I got older, I was allowed to assist with basic prep tasks. The kind of stuff Mum would do while watching the television – taking the tops and tails off snow peas and beans. I remember a few times when there’d be a big function coming up at work, and Mum would have to take stuff home to prep for the next day. Maybe I was a little too excited at the prospect of threading thousands of satay chicken skewers, but there was something that just felt good when I was being useful in the kitchen and not just a pain in the butt.

Dad was particularly overprotective of me when I was a kid, which frustrated me to no end because I think he must have known that I’d inherited some of his inquisitive and adventurous nature. I was never allowed to cut anything, or cook anything, while I was growing up. Sometimes I wonder whether my fear of knives and fire is actually something that I’ve always had, or whether it came from having so many lectures drummed into me about how dangerous a place the kitchen was. Of course, Dad probably had no idea that all his warnings against me messing about in the kitchen were like the psychological equivalent of a ‘Wet Paint’ sign.

I can’t remember how old I was, when we first got a microwave. It wasn’t long until my brother and I were allowed to graduate to two-minute noodles cooked on the stove, and I became a little more curious about expanding my repertoire. After much begging and pleading, Dad finally let me pick out some ingredients for a stir-fry, promising that some day in the week he’d show me how to cook it all up.

It was school holidays or something similar, and no one was home when I decided it was the perfect time to try and guess how to cook a stir-fry. Just imagine how impressed my folks would be that I had made lunch/dinner all by myself! I couldn’t wait for Dad’s vital masterclass on stir-fries, so I cobbled together whatever memories I had of the steps my parents took when cooking one. As it turns out, I probably should have paid more attention, and I believe that up until that point I had never seen them actually cook a stir-fry from start to finish – possibly because I had always been booted out of the kitchen for being annoying whilst they were trying to get dinner ready!

The good news? Well, I didn’t burn the house down. The bad news – it was a minor disaster. I had way too many vegetables, none of which were consistently sized enough to cook at a similar rate, I think I used too much sauce and not enough oil, and threw in uncooked rice for good measure. Oh, and my solo cooking adventure was also the first and last time I was allowed to do anything in the kitchen that didn’t involve the microwave, toaster, or two-minute noodles. No unsupervised use of knives and open flames for me!

I never got that lesson on stir-fries. Perhaps my folks decided then and there that hospitality was definitely not my calling. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve always loved food, and was certainly more interested in what was for dinner and how it was made than my brother ever was, but neither of my parents thought it was a good idea to encourage me to cook. I actually didn’t learn a proper stir-fry method until I went to TAFE a couple of years ago – shameful, I know.

It often baffles people to hear that I can’t stand doing stir-fries, and although I love to eat a lot of different Asian cuisines, I get this weird mental block about trying to cook them. I suppose it’s comparable to how I feel embarrassed and uncomfortable whenever I try to speak the pitiful amount of Mandarin that I know. I went to classes for years to try and learn it properly, but often got tongue-tied even though in my head I knew what I was trying to say. Yet after studying Italian in school and working in a couple of Italian restaurants, I had no qualms about slipping in the odd Italian phrase here and there in conversation with customers and colleagues.

Perhaps it’s never too late to learn. Maybe I should go back home some time and spend an afternoon cooking with Mum or Dad, and take some notes on what they do and how. I don’t mean to lament that all their recipes are lost forever, because they’re not, but I guess it saddens me that they never saw it as particularly important to pass any of their culinary knowledge on to me. They were always happy enough to feed me, and even take requests, but now that I’m older and my visits to Melbourne tend to be more fly-by-night, it’s more likely that I’d stop by Mum’s just before dinner with friends… or I’ll catch up with Dad at our regular yum cha hangout.

Sometimes I wonder whether they’re proud of the fact that I made it somewhere in hospitality, despite all their efforts to keep me out of the kitchen. There are times when I’ve been chuffed yet still surprised to receive compliments about my cooking, almost as if I’m still that kid messing about with a wok while home alone, trying to prove something to myself as well as my folks about the kitchen not being the place for me.

I’ve been cut, bruised, soaked, splashed, and burned in the relatively short time that I’ve been cooking. I’m no longer scared of knives and fire – it’s the cutting and burning that I’m more worried about. What’s amusing is that a couple of birthdays ago, I received knives as gifts from three people, and last Christmas I got a blowtorch. Maybe I’m the most dangerous thing in the kitchen?

Well, I can’t say my folks didn’t try to warn me.

strategic reform - a cook's view

In another time, another world, the words 'strategic reform program' would probably send me to sleep. Defence's overall plan for SRP (we do love a good acronym to throw around like confetti) has been the talk of the town for the past few months, and with its implementation will come various changes, most of which will no doubt irritate the old boys' club.

Don't get me wrong, I'm no expert on reform, let alone strategic reform, or even Defence strategic reform. However, I've been around for long enough to acknowledge that the kind of people that bang on about 'the good old days' and how they're over, are exactly the sort of people that wouldn't necessarily hold back, yet wouldn't exactly embrace changes to the status quo. No matter how strategic they may or may not appear to be.

What I found particularly amusing the other day is that one of the agencies responsible for supervising the implementation of SRP is Defence funded, and has supposedly fudged budget predictions to show false or exaggerated numbers relating to proposed savings. I don't know how you'd be able to prove either way whether proposed savings are realistic or not, because it's essentially all conjecture. I think that if actual changes were rolled out and then the data relating to real savings came out from that, it would be slightly more encouraging to the general public.

Defence is a massive organisation in Australia, and as with any business, the little savings that can be made every day don't seem as important or noticeable as slashes to departmental budgets or staff cuts. I believe that we've probably gone for too long thinking in this mindset, and because we're such a large group of people, we have the numbers that mean if the majority of individuals take some positive action most days, it really can make a difference.

With all that said, I have a few suggestions that could contribute to savings for Defence. I don't imagine they'll actually get considered let alone implemented, but you know, I've been saying for a while that if I had my own military, I would run things quite differently. :)

1. Once a month, across all Defence establishments, run a vegetarian-only day. If my base is a typical example of meals that are offered in accordance to SUPMAN (Defence policy on food entitlements), every meal period has a choice of five meat dishes and one vegetarian dish. One of those meat dishes is usually a roast of some kind. Meat is expensive, and not a compulsory requirement for one's daily nutritional intake. Even if the roast choice was changed so that the slab of meat could be used for the equivalent of two or three other dishes, there would be significant savings, as well as a greater appreciation for when a roast dish is available.
2. Remove valuable Defence members from inflight kitchens, and outsource the provision of sandwiches, morning teas, inflight meals, barbecue packs, etc. to civilian contractors. The amount of money that is invested in training deployable catering staff which is then wasted by tying them up with tasks that civilians are capable of doing is indicative of the irrationality that governs certain Defence resources.
3. Buy in enough raw ingredients to produce sweets for all meals. At the moment we don't usually have the staff time available for constant large-scale sweets production, but if you compare the cost of having a permanent sweets position versus buying in frozen sweets to cut up and garnish, the former may actually be cheaper in the long run. One of my colleagues believes we should just spend the money on buying in individual frozen sweets that don't require cutting/garnishing/plating, but his method saves Defence catering time, while my idea cuts down on the cost spent on sweets.
4. While I'm on the sweets thing, perhaps there should be a review of what SUPMAN has to say about having sweets available for lunch and dinner. Is cake really an essential part of one's daily diet? Even back in rookies, when we were exercising most days of the week, we were advised to take it easy with the dessert bar. Imagine what some people are like once they have moved into more sedentary roles, and still have the same access to sweets and ice cream? I don't think it would kill anyone to have a sweets-free day once in a while, or to only have sweets available with lunch or dinner, but not both.

These are only a few ideas that relate to catering, which I've managed to come up with straight off the bat. I'll mull over a few more that may apply to more than just my section, but I figure that any change to what people eat or are allowed to eat would no doubt be unpopular. Unless they somehow find a way to feed people more.

I think that the key to improving things in the catering section is to increase the quality of the food, work on realistically altering people's expectations of what's available in 2010 and beyond, and then meet or exceed them.

Sparrow, Barrie, ze militoire and me

I'm in the middle of a book entitled Killing: Misadventures in Violence by Jeff Sparrow, who I saw at the Festival of Dangerous Ideas. Sparrow gave an intriguing talk about Why We Enjoy Killing, which was partial allusion to some of the themes he explored in his book, and also an incredibly passionate source of food for thought in these times of war and seemingly inescapable violence.

It was particularly interesting to hear Sparrow talk about the inevitability of war/violence after attending the preceding talk by Rear Admiral Chris Barrie, which presented and outlined a proposition to bring back conscription. One of Sparrow's points that resonated with me from his talk at the Festival was that a country such as the US has spent literally billions of dollars funding their efforts in the War On Terror, a war which implicitly has no real end/solution in sight. He posited the idea that if the US decided instead to use this money to provide potable water to everyone on the entire planet, it would probably do a lot more to win hearts and minds than any sort of nation-building action that has taken place thus far. Would something like this ever actually happen? Probably not, because despite the clear logic behind taking such a purely positive action with a vast sum of money/resources, there are too many people/organisations that have vested interests in maintaining the status quo.

Of course, I'm paraphrasing and simplifying what Sparrow was saying, and leaving out everything that he said before he reached this point in his talk. Another pertinent point of his was that if you took everything that was said about the Iraq War by even the most conservative of opinions (it will be controlled, it will be short, it will be targeted/specific and minimise any effect on civilians), you could spin it around 180 degrees to get what actually happened/is happening. Not that I know anything about Operation Iraqi Freedom in general or particular, apart from the fact that the ADF's contribution in Iraq (Operation Catalyst) ended in July this year, and that's only because I chose to read my email carefully that day.

I don't know if it was the mood I was in that weekend, from the come-down of being in the soapbox finals (after ranting about women in the military and having more than a healthy dig at Greg Sheridan, no less), or from spending a rainy couple of days in Sydney by myself... but I felt a bit strange about being who I am, and where I was. On one hand, I was getting all fired up about how conscription (no matter how innovative and 'fair' Barrie's new program may have seemed) would possibly be to the detriment of the next generation of young Australians, while I was a serving member that didn't feel compelled enough to care about international affairs, to know anything apart from ADF press releases about what part we had to play in wars on the other side of the world.

I remember when I first started talking to people about enlisting, and how I'd end up having by-the-by conversations with people about their reasons for not following a similar path to me:

Oh, I couldn't possibly join the military...

• I'm a total pacifist. The idea of being told to fight in someone else's war goes against everything I believe in.
• I don't think I could just do whatever I was told to do. The idea of blindly following orders because I had to, scares the bejeezus out of me.
• I question everything too much. I don't think I'd last too long in a military environment without speaking up about something that wasn't adequately explained or justified.
• I'm too much of a control freak. The idea of submitting to anonymous authority figures and the decisions they make is the last thing I'd want to do.

Personally, I think I am a combination of all of these points. By signing on the dotted line, I accept that I have agreed to serve Queen and country for four years of my life, and to remain on call to serve further if someone higher up sees fit. I didn't enlist because I am pro-violence or in favour of any war - rather, if all shit hits the fan, I'd rather be in uniform and doing my bit for my nation than taking a back seat and bitching about how war's good for absolutely nothin'. Don't get me wrong, I am not foolish enough to believe that the ADF's participation in wars around the world is anything like that of countries like the US, nor do I think Australians in general have any real concept of what it would be like to have war/violence as a constant feature of one's culture.

For the record, I do question things, and I am a bit of a control freak. I don't know how I manage to avoid getting into trouble more often for having this sort of attitude, but after not getting kicked out thus far for the things I have said and done, I can probably safely say that it is possible to survive within the ranks (as lowly as I may be?!) without becoming a mindless drone. There have been many times in my life when the authority that I have answered to has been a lot less defined or structured, and I believe I have been more damaged through the control I have given to others during my civilian life, rather than in the time I've spent in uniform.

If anything, prior to my enlistment, I probably wouldn't have had the nerve to get on a soapbox and rant about women in the military (or anything similar that would get me into the finals and voicing my thoughts in front of hundreds of strangers). I wouldn't have formed opinions about the ADF and conscription to ask serious questions of Rear Admiral Barrie after his talk. I may not have even come across Jeff Sparrow (apart from perhaps through the Overland literary journal that he edits), let alone his book on killing. I definitely wouldn't have cared to pay more than accidental attention to the ADF's involvement in Iraq.

I had numerous reservations of my own about enlisting, and about becoming a part of something much, much, bigger than myself for the first time in my short and somewhat sheltered life. Although I can understand why it is generally believed that there's more bad than good about joining the military, I'd like to say that it has made me a better person. You could say that I'm spouting just what the ADF wants me to, but let me also add that although the ADF can be a great option for certain people, it's definitely not for everyone. I think I had a point to make about the relation between making hundreds of sandwiches and holding a gun to someone's head, but that might have to wait until I've finished the book...

do something, before we all get taken over by Asians!

As part of the Festival of Dangerous Ideas over the weekend, Rear Admiral Chris Barrie spoke about the prospect of bringing back conscription. He opened with an introduction that was pretty much along the same lines as this opinion piece in the Sydney Morning Herald, then continued to flesh out some of the finer details of his proposed scheme, and what made it different to the conscription programs of the past.

Mr Barrie has been retired from the Navy for about five or six years now, but listening to him speak showed that forty years of service still manages to shape his words a certain way. In the first part of his talk, there was mention of all manner of statistics and numbers drawn from various reports, to support a somewhat bleak view of what Australia could be like by 2050 if we go on about our merry way. That way being the maintenance of voluntary participation in military, emergency, and community service jobs, and addressing the lack of skilled workers in civilian employment by hiring appropriate employees from overseas. While our Asian neighbours continue to increase in population and improve their standards of living through increased industrialisation and our old pal capitalism, Australia will struggle under the increasing burden of an ageing population and a lack of production from the nation's brood mares, neigh, women.

So I guess what Barrie was trying to say (to the predominantly older middle-class white intelligentsia gathered in the Utzon Room at the Sydney Opera House on NRL Grand Final day) is something along the lines of we're going to hell in a handbasket unless we sort out today's young people with a good dose of national service. For every old person in the Australian community some time in the frightening pre-apocalyptic future, there'd only be 2.4 young people in the workforce that would be able to provide some sort of care or service. Clearly not enough slaves to do the bidding of all the pensioners of Australia! But I digress. The question of whether China is a real threat to us and our way of life, or if we're really going to be okay with Indonesians having a better lifestyle than us in the future, or the possibility that Australia will lose its identity amongst a mass of immigrating cultures, is swept aside and rolled up into the phrase Australia's positioning in the Asia-Pacific region by 2050. Or something like that.

How does Barrie's AUSSIE (Australian Universal Service Scheme - Individual Experience?) conscription program intend to address this? Well, the idea is that by taking part in various tasks of a community/nation serving nature, Australia's young people will gain points towards the completion of the scheme. For example, every young man and woman will be required to sign up and work towards 1000 points of 'service' within ten years. This service is not necessarily military, and the jobs that are available will be flexible and varied enough so that some Australians may wish to continue employment in various fields, even once their 1000 points are completed. Rewards and incentives such as gaining a passport (true citizenship à la Starship Troopers, anyone?), wiping off HECS debts, or achieving advanced standing within public service and military career paths could also be incorporated with the scheme.

I agree with Barrie that Defence is always going to have a problem with recruiting the numbers it requires to make up for natural attrition, as well as to expand in the areas it needs to as the forces grow in the future. There will also be no doubt that the strain on resources required by the ageing populous will only continue to increase. The idea of implementing a universal conscription scheme that incorporates services to the community in multiple forms other than in merely a military environment is definitely worthy of public debate. I appreciate that by making 'conscription' universal rather than selective is quite different to how troops were signed up in the past, and I also believe that by offering a range of jobs to suit people's varying preferences and aptitudes, most people can be accommodated for.

However:

• I believe there is an inherent danger in employing people in the military if it is not entirely of their own volition.


• I question the effectiveness of a group of young people that have been coerced in any way to serve in such positions, and I worry about the consequences of trying to get AUSSIE troops to work alongside people that have voluntarily chosen military jobs.


• Instead of throwing $500 million at Defence Force Recruiting to figure out how to entice more people to enlist in the forces, why can't the ADF work on retaining as much staff as possible, and taking constructive steps towards making it an appealing enough workplace that people actually might want to work in without all the flashbangwaheynowwhizzery?


• Military stuff aside... why should a whole generation of young Australians be forced into service jobs that for the most part involve taking care of a generation that wasn't forward-thinking enough to find a less uh... Communist(?) way of tackling the messed up babies-to-oldies-ratio problem?


• If it takes about ten years to clock up these 1000 points of service, with the potential to keep a whole generation locked in to various jobs in the local community (especially if you can't get a passport!), will we end up with a mass of socially retarded, cultureless, unchallenged thirtysomething Australians left to write some pages in our nation's glittering history?

Perhaps the true danger behind Barrie's idea lies in the inevitability of such a program being hatched by those who have been shrouded in matters of Defence and politics for too long. This can only mean that the return of conscription in this sense will no doubt be fundamentally flawed, to the detriment of yet another generation of Australians.